Ecovacs WINBOT MINI or Lubluelu CHYW201: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two window-cleaning robots using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
Main drawbackWater tank capacity is the main limitation for extensive glass areas
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →
Lubluelu CHYW201
Main drawbackMains power makes cord routing part of every setup
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Water tank capacity”Lubluelu CHYW201 9.5 / 10 vs 7.9
By criterion
| Criterion | Ecovacs WINBOT MINI | Lubluelu CHYW201 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction pressure | 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Water tank capacity | 7.9 | 9.5 advantage |
| Backup battery holding time | 9 | 9 |
| Equipment | 8.9 | 8.9 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Ecovacs WINBOT MINI | Lubluelu CHYW201 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction pressure | 7500 Pa | 6500 Pa |
| Electrical power | 90 W | Not provided |
| Water tank capacity | 60 ml | 160 ml |
| Battery-powered cleaning runtime | Not disclosed | Not provided |
| Backup battery holding time | 30 min | 30 min |
| Robot height | 5,5 cm | Not provided |
| Noise level | 63 dB | Not provided |
| Power supply during cleaning | Mains-powered | Mains-powered |
| Manufacturer's intended use | Household | Household |
| Compatible surfaces | Mirrors | Mirrors |
| Indoor / outdoor cleaning | Outdoor | Outdoor |
| Window compatibility | Framed | Framed |
| Spraying | Automatic | Dual spray |
| Control | App | Remote control |
| Safety features | UPS backup battery | UPS backup battery |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Ecovacs WINBOT MINI
Leads on 0 criterion of 4 compared
- No numerical specification sets it apart in this comparison.
Lubluelu CHYW201
Leads on 1 criterion of 4 compared
- Water tank capacity: 9.5/10 vs 7.9/10 (160 ml vs 60 ml)
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Ecovacs WINBOT MINI or Lubluelu CHYW201?
They're neck and neck: 8.7/10 for Ecovacs WINBOT MINI, 9/10 for Lubluelu CHYW201. A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage.
Which wins on “Water tank capacity”?
Lubluelu CHYW201 wins on “Water tank capacity”: 9.5/10 compared with 7.9/10 for Ecovacs WINBOT MINI. Recorded values: 160 ml versus 60 ml.