Lifenaxx LX-055 or Lubluelu CHYW201: which should you choose?
Comparison of the two window-cleaning robots using our catalogue's scoring criteria, value by value. Scores are relative to all the models we have analysed.
Lifenaxx LX-055
Main drawbackSuction pressure sits near the bottom of advertised category figures
Read the full analysis →
Lubluelu CHYW201
Main drawbackMains power makes cord routing part of every setup
Check price on Amazon → Read the full analysis →Our verdict based on your priority
- Priority: “Suction pressure”Lubluelu CHYW201 8.6 / 10 vs 7.1
- Priority: “Water tank capacity”Lubluelu CHYW201 9.5 / 10 vs 8.7
- Priority: “Backup battery holding time”Lubluelu CHYW201 9 / 10 vs 7.5
- Priority: “Equipment”Lifenaxx LX-055 9.5 / 10 vs 8.9
By criterion
| Criterion | Lifenaxx LX-055 | Lubluelu CHYW201 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction pressure | 7.1 | 8.6 advantage |
| Water tank capacity | 8.7 | 9.5 advantage |
| Backup battery holding time | 7.5 | 9 advantage |
| Equipment | 9.5 advantage | 8.9 |
A gap of less than half a point does not count as an advantage: our scores are relative to the catalogue, and using them to pick a winner would imply a level of precision we cannot offer.
Side-by-side specs
| Specification | Lifenaxx LX-055 | Lubluelu CHYW201 |
|---|---|---|
| Suction pressure | 2800 Pa | 6500 Pa |
| Electrical power | 72 W | Not provided |
| Water tank capacity | 70 ml | 160 ml |
| Backup battery holding time | 20 min | 30 min |
| Robot height | 8,2 cm | Not provided |
| Robot weight | 1,16 kg | Not provided |
| Power supply during cleaning | Mains-powered | Mains-powered |
| Compatible surfaces | Mirrors, Tiles | Mirrors |
| Window compatibility | Framed | Framed |
| Spraying | Dual spray, Automatic | Dual spray |
| Control | Remote control | Remote control |
| Safety features | UPS backup battery, Edge detection, Safety rope | UPS backup battery |
| Cleaning modes | Edges | Quick |
Figures published by manufacturers and retailers, compiled in our reviews. “Not provided” means the figure could not be verified.
Which is right for you?
Lubluelu CHYW201
Leads on 3 criteria of 4 compared
- Suction pressure: 8.6/10 vs 7.1/10 (6500 Pa vs 2800 Pa)
- Backup battery holding time: 9/10 vs 7.5/10 (30 min vs 20 min)
- Water tank capacity: 9.5/10 vs 8.7/10 (160 ml vs 70 ml)
- Manufacturer's intended use: Household
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Comparison based on published specifications and our scores, calculated using the same criteria for every model. Our methodology →
Frequently asked questions
Which is rated higher, Lifenaxx LX-055 or Lubluelu CHYW201?
Lubluelu CHYW201 scores 9/10, compared with 8.2/10 for Lifenaxx LX-055, using the same scoring criteria.
Which wins on “Suction pressure”?
Lubluelu CHYW201 wins on “Suction pressure”: 8.6/10 compared with 7.1/10 for Lifenaxx LX-055. Recorded values: 6500 Pa versus 2800 Pa.
Which wins on “Backup battery holding time”?
Lubluelu CHYW201 wins on “Backup battery holding time”: 9/10 compared with 7.5/10 for Lifenaxx LX-055. Recorded values: 30 min versus 20 min.
Which wins on “Water tank capacity”?
Lubluelu CHYW201 wins on “Water tank capacity”: 9.5/10 compared with 8.7/10 for Lifenaxx LX-055. Recorded values: 160 ml versus 70 ml.
Which wins on “Equipment”?
Lifenaxx LX-055 wins on “Equipment”: 9.5/10 compared with 8.9/10 for Lubluelu CHYW201.